USMLE/ABIM Question #2

Pulmonary Embolism

Date Published: 2/15/2025

Vignette:

A 81-year-old woman with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation presents to the emergency department with acute onset dyspnea. She has been off anticoagulation for the past month due to a recent fall with minor head trauma (negative head CT at the time). Her medical history includes chronic kidney disease (CrCl 35 mL/min), hypertension, and recurrent falls due to peripheral neuropathy. Current medications include metoprolol and gabapentin. CT pulmonary angiogram confirms bilateral subsegmental pulmonary emboli without evidence of right heart strain. Vital signs show: BP 132/78 mmHg, HR 82/min, RR 20/min, O2 saturation 94% on room air. Laboratory studies reveal: Hgb 11.2 g/dL, platelets 165,000/µL, INR 1.1, creatinine 1.6 mg/dL (stable), albumin 3.1 g/dL. She weighs 52 kg. Her simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score is 1 (age >80).

Question:

Which of the following is the most appropriate anticoagulation strategy for this patient?

A)  apixaban 10 mg BID for 7 days, then 5 mg BID

B)  apixaban 5 mg BID for 7 days, then 2.5 mg BID

C) Warfarin with LMWH bridge

D) Prophylactic-dose LMWH only

E)  rivaroxaban 15 mg BID for 21 days, then 20 mg daily

Audio

Video

- Advertisement -

Correct Answer:

B) apixaban 5 mg BID for 7 days, then 2.5 mg BID

Explanation of Correct Answer:

This patient requires careful anticoagulation strategy because she has:

  • Age >80 years
  • Low body weight (<60 kg)
  • Moderate renal impairment
  • History of falls
  • Need for both PE treatment and AF prevention

Reduced-dose apixaban is optimal because:

  • Meets two criteria for dose reduction (≥2 of: age ≥80, weight ≤60 kg, or Cr ≥1.5 mg/dL)
  • Has better bleeding risk profile compared to other anticoagulants
  • Provides coverage for both PE and AF
  • No need for monitoring despite renal impairment
  • More stable pharmacokinetics compared to warfarin

Explanation of Incorrect Answers:

A) Standard-dose apixaban - Full dosing would create excessive bleeding risk given her age, weight, and renal function.

C) Warfarin with LMWH bridge - Higher bleeding risk and more complex monitoring than necessary; would complicate management in a fall-risk patient.

D) Prophylactic-dose LMWH only - Inadequate for both PE treatment and AF stroke prevention.

E) Standard-dose rivaroxaban - Once-daily dosing might be appealing, but rivaroxaban is more dependent on renal function than apixaban and has higher bleeding risk.

- Advertisement -

Alternative Scenarios:

  1. If CrCl was <25 mL/min, warfarin may be preferred
  2. If patient weight was >60 kg and normal renal function, standard-dose apixaban would be appropriate

Additional Facts:

  • Apixaban has the lowest bleeding risk among DOACs in elderly patients
  • Reduced-dose criteria for apixaban: ≥2 of age ≥80, weight ≤60 kg, or Cr ≥1.5 mg/dL
  • Subsegmental PE still requires therapeutic anticoagulation in most cases
  • DOACs are preferred over warfarin in elderly patients with normal to moderately impaired renal function
  • Fall risk alone is not a contraindication to anticoagulation

Main Takeaway:

Reduced-dose apixaban provides optimal anticoagulation in elderly, low-weight patients with moderate renal impairment who need treatment for both PE and AF, balancing efficacy with bleeding risk.

Next Question
- Advertisement -

Newsletter

Be the first to get updates in your inbox by filling out the form below!

Podcast

Subscribe for concise summaries to help you approach common clinical presentations, along with high-yield clinical pearls relevant to your day-to-day practice.

Socials

Follow us for educational threads, infographics, video summaries, and to stay up to date on all our new content.